Learning Through the Museum Assessment Program
In this week’s post, I want to highlight one of the most effective museum review processes around – the American Association of Museum’s (AAM) Museum Assessment Program (MAP). If you are not affiliated with a museum, the MAP model of mentoring is an ideal for other nonprofits to support their base constituencies. The MAP process first guides an institution through an intensive period of self-study. Next, the self-study documentation is assigned to an external peer reviewer, who then visits the institution for an onsite review. Finally, the reviewer produces a report that is delivered to the institution with recommendations to help guide the museum through its short and long-term tasks for best practices. Over the past two years at the C.H. Nash Museum, we completed two separate MAP reviews – one that considered our entire institutional operation and a second that focused on our collections. As a reasonably small museum, we found this process extremely helpful.
Here are our major takeaways from the process:
- During our weekly meetings for the self-study period, all staff, including our graduate assistants met and discussed specific questions in the MAP review. The decision to engage the entire staff in the study allowed us to build a solid foundation for both the peer review and the final report. Through the self-study,I learned a great deal about aspects of our operation that are not part of my day-to-day experience at the museum. The self-study is structured such that it produces a truly holistic assessment of the museum operation.
- Both of our MAP final reports produced superb analyses and recommendations for our museum operation. The recommendations were organized as short, middle, and long-term goals and further ranked by cost to carry out. The final report also included resources to guide the implementation of the recommendations.
- Carry the prestige and authority of the AAM, our governing authority and board were very receptive to the final report recommendations. As a small institution with perhaps too many pokers in the fire, the MAP process formed a basis for us to strategically reassess our process for the coming years.
- I also appreciate that the MAP program does not end with the final report. Both of our AAM reviewers extended an open invitation to remain in dialogue as we work through the report recommendations.
As well, MAP now provides a resource for digital interaction with a newly launched on-line community for MAP participants. Some of the on-line resources include:
- a guide for using completed MAP reports to leverage funding for museum projects and needs
- a set of links for museum best practices
- a series of webinars on a range of museum practices
- and a recently launched blog that will hopefully continue to grow
The MAP program is an excellent resource particularly for the small to mid-sized museums that need to step back and take a fresh look at their total operation in general or as a first step toward AAM accreditation. The MAP process is a very useful tool as we move into the new realities of sustainable, engaged, and socially relevant museum operations.
Have you benefited from a MAP or similar type of experience?
Visit the MAP weblink for more information about applying for the program.